SEC Litigation Release No. 22742
July 3, 2013
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Magdalena
Tavella, et al.
Civil Action No. 13 CIV 4609 (S.D.N.Y.)
The Securities and Exchange
Commission filed a complaint against 8 Argentine citizens who are alleged to
have unlawfully sold millions of shares of Biozoom, Inc. in unregistered
transactions. The SEC also secured a TRO, freezing assets held in U.S. securities
firms in accounts of the eight defendants and two other Argentine citizens who
had Biozoom shares but had not yet sold them. Last week the SEC suspended
trading in Biozoom due to concerns that some shareholders may be unlawfully
distributing its securities.
The SEC alleges that from
March to June 2013, the defendants received more than 20 million shares of
Biozoom (formerly Entertainment Art, Inc.) or one-third of the company's total
outstanding shares. In a one-month period beginning in May, 8 of the Defendants
sold more than 14 million shares yielding almost $34 million. $17
million out of the sales proceeds was wired to overseas bank accounts.
According to the SEC's
complaint, the Defendants claimed to have acquired the bulk of the shares in
March 2013 from Biozoom’s former shareholders who purchased them in private
placements that began in 2007. Each of the defendants provided stock purchase
agreements between them and the former shareholders purportedly signed by the
defendants and those shareholders.
The SEC alleges that the
documents were false because the Entertainment Art investors had sold all of
their stock in the company in 2009, almost four years earlier. As the complaint
alleges:
On July 18, 2008,
Entertainment Art filed a Form S-1 registration statement with the Commission
to register the resale transactions for the 34 shareholders who acquired
Entertainment Art stock in these private placements ("the Form S-1
Shareholders"). In particular, of the total 1,810,000 shares outstanding
at the time of the Form S-1, Entertainment Art's S-1 covered 610,000, or
approximately one-third, of the company's then outstanding shares.
The remaining 1,200,000
shares of Entertainment Art stock were held by the three company officers in
three identical 400,000 share blocks.
On May 1, 2009, Entertainment
Art announced, in a public filing with the Commission, that the three
Entertainment Art officers sold their total 1,200,000 shares of Entertainment
Art to "Medford Financial" a Belizean entity, for a purchase price of
$120,000.
Contrary to this disclosure,
however, Medford Financial purchased more than 1,200,000 shares of
Entertainment Art. In fact, Medford Financial also purchased all of the 610,000
shares that had been purchased by the S-1 shareholders. Thus, in this
transaction, Medford Financial purchased all of the outstanding shares,
including the shares then held by the Form S-1 Shareholders.
Each of the S-1
shareholders received their initial investment back, with an additional, small
return on their investment. Thus, by on or around May 2009, each of the S-1
shareholders had no remaining shares or other interest in Entertainment Art.
According to company
filings, on June 30, 2009, Entertainment Art's board of directors
approved the implementation of a 33:1 forward split for Entertainment Art stock
without correspondingly increasing the authorized shares of common stock for
Entertainment Art. On July 21, 2009, the forward split became effective, and as
a result of the forward split, the company had 59,730,000 shares of common stock
outstanding-which was all owned by Medford Financial.
On October 25, 2012,
Entertainment Art reported, in a public filing with the Commission, that on
October 19 Medford Financial sold 39,600,000 common shares of Entertainment Art
in a private transaction with LeMond Capital for a purchase price of $430,000,
which equates to approximately $0.01 per share.
LeMond Capital purports to
be a foreign entity based in the British Virgin Islands. As a result of the
sale, Entertainment Art disclosed that LeMond Capital controlled over 66.3% of
the Company's issued and outstanding common stock.
However, on information and
belief, Le Mond Capital purchased the entire company from Medford Financial-and
all of 59,730,000 outstanding shares.
The owner of LeMond
Capital, Sara Deutsch, became Entertainment Art's new President, Chief
Executive Officer, Principal Executive Officer, Treasurer, Chief Financial
Officer, Secretary, Treasurer, and Director. On information and belief, Deutsch
is a resident of Buenos Aires, Argentina.
From September 2011 to at
least October 2012, Deutsch worked as a manager of Magdalena's Party. According
to the business' website, Magdalena's Party is a restaurant located in Buenos
Aires, Argentina. According to another website describing Magdalena's Party, it
is co-owned by Deutsch, defendant Magdalena Tavella, and others.
On March 12, 2013,
Entertainment Art filed a Form 8-K with the Commission in which it announced a
dramatic change in its business operations from a company that developed
fashionable leather bags to a company that was involved in the biomedical
industry. In particular, Entertainment Art announced a transaction pursuant to
which its newly formed subsidiary, Biozoom Technologies, Inc., acquired certain
patents, licenses, and related assets from each of three separate companies;
Opsolution Spectroscopic Systems, Opsolution NanoPhotonics, and Opsolution
GmBH, (the "Opsolution acquisition") in exchange for cash of $50,000
and 39 million shares of Entertainment Art common stock.
Entertainment Art described
that, through Biozoom, it was now in the business of "researching,
developing, and licensing technologies relating to the mobile remote collection
of biomedical data as well as bilateral diagnostic communication."
Entertainment Art further
disclosed that -as of immediately after closing of the Opsolution acquisition
and filing of the Form 8-K -Deutsch would step down as CEO and Chief Financial
Officer of Entertainment Art, but would stay on as a Director only.
As a result of the
transaction, the 59,730,000 outstanding shares of Entertainment .Art were
allocated in the following manner. First, Le Mond Capital returned 39,000,000
shares to the company, and then those 39,000,000 shares were allocated -as
shares bearing a restrictive legend -to four entities that were associated with
the Opsolution entities.
Thus, after these
allocations, 20,730,000 shares of Entertainment Art remained. Le Mond
Capital retained 600,000 of these shares bearing a restrictive legend. The
remaining 20,130,000 shares-which represented the total shares purchased by the
Form S-1 Shareholders (and subsequently sold in the Medford Financial
transaction on or around May 2009) -were unallocated.
On April 1, 2013,
Entertainment Art changed its name to Biozoom, under the trading symbol
"BIZM" on the OTC Bulletin Board.
The defendants' shares of
Biozoom were deposited into their accounts as shares that purportedly could be
freely traded and the defendants sold them even though no registration was in
effect and preemptively, no exemption applied.
In addition to the
temporary restraining order and asset freeze granted by the court, the SEC is
seeking preliminary and permanent injunctions, return of the selling
defendants' allegedly ill-gotten sale proceeds, and civil penalties. The SEC
also seeks preliminary and permanent injunctions against the non-selling
defendants because of the likelihood that both defendants will offer or sell
their Biozoom shares to the public in violation of the registration
requirements of U.S. securities law.
No comments:
Post a Comment